โ† Back|DATA-ENGINEERINGโ€บSection 1/17
0 of 17 completed

Data lakes vs warehouses

Intermediateโฑ 14 min read๐Ÿ“… Updated: 2026-02-17

Introduction

Data collect pannita โ€” ipo enga store pannanum? ๐Ÿค”


Idhu oru simple question maari theriyum, but wrong choice pannina lakhs of rupees waste aagum, performance drop aagum, AI models proper ah train aaga maatengum.


Two main options irukku: Data Lake ๐ŸŠโ€โ™‚๏ธ and Data Warehouse ๐Ÿข. Plus, modern world la Lakehouse ๐Ÿ  nu oru new concept varudhu.


Indha article la moonu concepts um clear ah purinjidum โ€” with real examples and when to use what! ๐Ÿš€

What is a Data Warehouse?

Data Warehouse = Organized, clean, structured data store โ€” specifically designed for analytics and reporting.


Analogy: Neatly organized library ๐Ÿ“š

  • Books properly cataloged
  • Each book has ISBN, category, shelf number
  • Librarian maintain pannum
  • Easy to find what you need

Characteristics:

  • Structured data only (tables, rows, columns)
  • Schema-on-write โ€” data load pannumbodhe schema define pannanum
  • Optimized for reads โ€” fast queries
  • Clean data โ€” ETL process vazhiyaa cleaned data mattum varum
  • Expensive storage โ€” but fast query performance

Popular Data Warehouses:

ToolProviderBest For
BigQueryGoogleServerless analytics
SnowflakeIndependentMulti-cloud
RedshiftAWSAWS ecosystem
SynapseAzureMicrosoft ecosystem
TeradataOn-premiseEnterprise legacy

What is a Data Lake?

Data Lake = Massive storage that accepts any type of data โ€” structured, semi-structured, unstructured โ€” in raw format.


Analogy: Oru periya lake ๐ŸŠโ€โ™‚๏ธ

  • Any water source varudhu (river, rain, drain)
  • Water filtered ah illa, raw ah store aagudhu
  • Need pannum bodhu filter panni use pannuvaanga
  • Massive volume handle pannudhu

Characteristics:

  • Any data type โ€” CSV, JSON, images, videos, logs
  • Schema-on-read โ€” read pannumbodhu dhaan schema apply pannum
  • Raw data โ€” as-is from source
  • Cheap storage โ€” object storage (S3, GCS) use pannum
  • Flexible โ€” future use cases ku ready

Popular Data Lake Storage:

ToolTypeCost
AWS S3Object store~$0.023/GB/month
Google Cloud StorageObject store~$0.020/GB/month
Azure Data Lake StorageObject store~$0.018/GB/month
HDFSOn-premiseHardware cost
MinIOSelf-hostedFree (open source)

Head-to-Head Comparison

Side-by-side comparison paapom:


FeatureData Lake ๐ŸŠโ€โ™‚๏ธData Warehouse ๐Ÿข
**Data Type**Any (raw)Structured only
**Schema**Schema-on-readSchema-on-write
**Users**Data Scientists, ML EngineersBusiness Analysts, BI
**Processing**ELTETL
**Cost**๐Ÿ’ฐ Low storage๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿ’ฐ High compute
**Query Speed**๐Ÿข Slow (without optimization)๐Ÿš€ Fast (optimized)
**Flexibility**โœ… Very flexibleโŒ Rigid schema
**Data Quality**โš ๏ธ Variesโœ… High (curated)
**Scale**Petabytes+Terabytes
**Best For**AI/ML, explorationReports, dashboards

Key insight: It's not Lake vs Warehouse โ€” most companies use both! Lake la raw data store pannuvaanga, Warehouse la clean data analytics ku use pannuvaanga. ๐ŸŽฏ

Schema-on-Write vs Schema-on-Read

โœ… Example

Idhu important concept โ€” example la paapom:

Schema-on-Write (Warehouse) ๐Ÿ“

code
Nee book library la add pannanum:
1. First โ€” book details fill pannunga (title, author, ISBN, category)
2. Rules follow pannunga (ISBN must be 13 digits, category must exist)
3. Apparam dhaan shelf la vekka mudiyum

Data load pannumbodhe structure enforce aagum. Wrong format data reject aaidum.

Schema-on-Read (Lake) ๐Ÿ“–

code
Nee box la books throw pannunga:
1. Any book, any format โ€” just throw it in
2. Read pannumbodhu dhaan โ€” "oh this is fiction, this is science"
3. Same book different ways la read pannalam

Data raw ah store pannum. Read pannumbodhu dhaan structure apply pannum.

AI ku: Schema-on-read better โ€” raw data la hidden patterns irukkum, schema enforce pannina lose aaidum! ๐Ÿค–

The Lakehouse: Best of Both Worlds ๐Ÿ 

2020s la oru new concept popularize aaichu โ€” Data Lakehouse!


Lakehouse = Data Lake + Data Warehouse features combined


Why Lakehouse?

  • Lake la data quality issues irukku
  • Warehouse la flexibility issues irukku
  • Rendu maintain panradhu expensive
  • Why not combine?

Lakehouse features:

  • โœ… Raw data store (like Lake)
  • โœ… ACID transactions (like Warehouse)
  • โœ… Schema enforcement optional
  • โœ… Fast SQL queries
  • โœ… ML workloads support
  • โœ… Cheap storage (object store based)

Popular Lakehouse Technologies:

TechnologyCreatorKey Feature
**Delta Lake**DatabricksACID on Spark
**Apache Iceberg**NetflixOpen table format
**Apache Hudi**UberIncremental processing

Medallion Architecture in Lakehouse:

  • ๐Ÿฅ‰ Bronze โ€” Raw data (as-is)
  • ๐Ÿฅˆ Silver โ€” Cleaned, validated
  • ๐Ÿฅ‡ Gold โ€” Business-ready, aggregated

Idhu modern standard โ€” most new projects Lakehouse architecture adopt pannuraanga! ๐Ÿš€

Modern Data Architecture

๐Ÿ—๏ธ Architecture Diagram
โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
โ”‚         MODERN LAKEHOUSE ARCHITECTURE            โ”‚
โ”œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ค
โ”‚                                                   โ”‚
โ”‚  SOURCES              LAKEHOUSE          CONSUMERSโ”‚
โ”‚  โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”   โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”  โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”‚ Databasesโ”‚โ”€โ”€โ–ถโ”‚ ๐Ÿฅ‰ BRONZE (Raw)  โ”‚  โ”‚BI Toolsโ”‚โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”‚ APIs     โ”‚โ”€โ”€โ–ถโ”‚      โ†“           โ”‚โ”€โ–ถโ”‚Tableau โ”‚โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”‚ Files    โ”‚โ”€โ”€โ–ถโ”‚ ๐Ÿฅˆ SILVER (Clean)โ”‚  โ”‚Looker  โ”‚โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”‚ Streams  โ”‚โ”€โ”€โ–ถโ”‚      โ†“           โ”‚  โ”œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”คโ”‚
โ”‚  โ”‚ IoT      โ”‚โ”€โ”€โ–ถโ”‚ ๐Ÿฅ‡ GOLD (Ready) โ”‚  โ”‚ AI/ML  โ”‚โ”‚
โ”‚  โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜   โ”‚                  โ”‚โ”€โ–ถโ”‚Models  โ”‚โ”‚
โ”‚                 โ”‚  Delta Lake /    โ”‚  โ”‚Feature โ”‚โ”‚
โ”‚                 โ”‚  Iceberg / Hudi  โ”‚  โ”‚Store   โ”‚โ”‚
โ”‚                 โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜  โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜โ”‚
โ”‚                         โ”‚                        โ”‚
โ”‚                 โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–ผโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”                โ”‚
โ”‚                 โ”‚  GOVERNANCE    โ”‚                โ”‚
โ”‚                 โ”‚ Catalogโ”‚Access โ”‚                โ”‚
โ”‚                 โ”‚ Lineageโ”‚Qualityโ”‚                โ”‚
โ”‚                 โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜                โ”‚
โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜

When to Use What?

Decision framework:


Use Data Warehouse when:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Business reporting is primary use case
  • ๐Ÿ“‹ Data is mostly structured (tables)
  • ๐Ÿ‘” Business users directly query pannum
  • โšก Fast query performance critical
  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Budget irukku for premium tools

Use Data Lake when:

  • ๐Ÿค– AI/ML workloads primary
  • ๐ŸŽฅ Unstructured data irukku (images, text, video)
  • ๐Ÿ”ฌ Data exploration & experimentation venum
  • ๐Ÿ’พ Massive data volume (petabytes)
  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Cost-sensitive (cheap storage venum)

Use Lakehouse when:

  • ๐ŸŽฏ Both analytics AND AI workloads
  • ๐Ÿ†• New project โ€” greenfield start panringa
  • ๐Ÿ”„ Don't want to maintain two systems
  • โšก Need ACID transactions on data lake
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Growing company โ€” future-proof venum

Quick Decision:

code
Only BI/Reports? โ”€โ”€โ–ถ Warehouse
Only AI/ML? โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–ถ Data Lake
Both? โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–ถ Lakehouse
Not sure? โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–ถ Lakehouse (safe choice)

Data Swamp Alert!

โš ๏ธ Warning

โš ๏ธ Data Lake โ†’ Data Swamp is a REAL problem!

Without governance, your beautiful lake becomes a swamp ๐ŸŠ:

- Nobody knows what data is where

- Duplicate data everywhere

- No documentation

- Stale/outdated data mixed with fresh data

- No access controls โ€” anyone dumps anything

- Query performance terrible

How to prevent:

1. ๐Ÿ“ Data Catalog โ€” Apache Atlas, AWS Glue Catalog use pannunga

2. ๐Ÿท๏ธ Metadata โ€” Every file ku owner, date, description irukanum

3. ๐Ÿ“‚ Folder Structure โ€” bronze/silver/gold organize pannunga

4. ๐Ÿ”’ Access Control โ€” Who can read/write what

5. ๐Ÿงน Cleanup Jobs โ€” Old/duplicate data regular ah clean pannunga

6. ๐Ÿ“Š Data Quality โ€” Automated checks run pannunga

"A data lake without governance is just an expensive hard drive" ๐Ÿ’ธ

Cost Comparison

Real-world cost comparison (approximate):


Storing 10 TB of data per month:


SolutionStorage CostQuery CostTotal/Month
S3 (Lake)$230$5-50 (Athena)~$280
BigQuery (WH)$200$50-500~$500
Snowflake (WH)$230$100-1000+~$800
Databricks (LH)$230$50-300~$400

Key insights:

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Storage โ€” Lake wins (object storage is cheapest)
  • โšก Query speed โ€” Warehouse wins (optimized engines)
  • ๐ŸŽฏ Total cost โ€” Depends on query volume!

Cost optimization tips:

  • Partition data by date โ€” query specific date range
  • Use columnar formats (Parquet, ORC) โ€” 10x compression
  • Set data lifecycle policies โ€” old data auto-archive
  • Use spot instances for batch processing
  • Monitor query costs โ€” set budgets and alerts

Real-World Architecture: Spotify

โœ… Example

Spotify oda data architecture paapom ๐ŸŽต:

Data Lake (Google Cloud Storage):

- Raw event data โ€” every play, skip, like, search

- 600+ billion events per day

- Stored as Avro/Parquet files

Data Warehouse (BigQuery):

- Cleaned, aggregated data

- Artist streaming counts

- Revenue calculations

- Business KPI dashboards

ML Feature Store:

- User taste profiles

- Song audio features

- Recommendation model inputs

Discover Weekly Pipeline:

1. ๐Ÿ“ฅ Lake la irundhu user listening history

2. ๐Ÿงน Clean โ€” duplicates, bots remove

3. ๐Ÿค– Collaborative filtering model run

4. ๐ŸŽต 30 personalized songs select per user

5. ๐Ÿ“ค Every Monday 600M+ users ku deliver

Lake + Warehouse + ML = Music magic! ๐ŸŽถ

Migration Strategy

Existing system la irundhu migrate pannanum na:


Warehouse โ†’ Lakehouse Migration:

  1. ๐Ÿ“‹ Audit current warehouse tables
  2. ๐ŸŠ Set up lakehouse (Delta Lake/Iceberg)
  3. ๐Ÿฅ‰ Bronze layer la raw data replicate
  4. ๐Ÿฅˆ Silver layer la current transformations recreate
  5. ๐Ÿฅ‡ Gold layer la warehouse tables mirror
  6. โœ… Validate โ€” results match aagudha?
  7. ๐Ÿ”„ Gradually switch consumers
  8. ๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Decommission old warehouse

Timeline: 3-6 months for medium company


Common pitfalls:

  • โŒ Big bang migration โ€” risk romba jaasthi
  • โŒ Skipping validation โ€” data mismatch catch aagadhu
  • โŒ Not training team โ€” new tools, new skills venum
  • โœ… Incremental migration โ€” table by table move pannunga

Prompt: Design Storage Architecture

๐Ÿ“‹ Copy-Paste Prompt
You are a data architect designing storage for an Indian fintech startup.

Requirements:
- 50M transactions per day
- Need real-time fraud detection (AI model)
- Regulatory compliance (7 year data retention)
- Monthly business reports for investors
- Budget: โ‚น5 lakhs/month for data infrastructure

Design the storage architecture:
1. What combination of Lake/Warehouse/Lakehouse?
2. Which specific tools and why?
3. Data retention and archival strategy
4. Cost breakdown
5. Team size needed

Explain in Tanglish. Be practical and cost-conscious.

โœ… Key Takeaways

Summary:


โœ… Data Warehouse โ€” Structured, clean, fast queries, BI-focused

โœ… Data Lake โ€” Any format, raw, cheap, AI/ML-focused

โœ… Lakehouse โ€” Best of both, modern standard

โœ… Schema-on-Write (Warehouse) vs Schema-on-Read (Lake)

โœ… Medallion Architecture โ€” Bronze โ†’ Silver โ†’ Gold

โœ… Data Swamp avoid pannunga โ€” governance is must!

โœ… Cost โ€” Lake storage cheap, but Warehouse queries fast

โœ… Modern trend โ€” Everyone moving to Lakehouse


Next article: Preparing Data for AI โ€” ML models ku data eppadi ready pannanum! ๐ŸŽฏ

๐Ÿ ๐ŸŽฎ Mini Challenge

Challenge: Lakehouse vs Lake vs Warehouse practical experience


Hands-on comparison โ€“ architectures test pannu:


Setup: S3 Data Lake (5 min)

bash
# Bronze layer (raw data)
aws s3 sync ./raw s3://my-lake/bronze/
# Silver layer (cleaned)
aws s3 sync ./cleaned s3://my-lake/silver/

Setup: BigQuery Warehouse (5 min)

  • Create dataset: bq mk my_dataset
  • Load CSV: bq load my_dataset.table_name data.csv

Setup: Delta Lake (Lakehouse) (5 min)

python
import delta
df.write.format("delta").mode("overwrite").save("s3://my-lake/delta/table")

Test Queries (20 min):

  1. Lake โ€“ S3 Select query (structured query on unstructured)
  2. Warehouse โ€“ SQL (instant, optimized)
  3. Lakehouse โ€“ Delta with SQL (best of both)

Compare:

  • Lake: Flexible, cheap, query slow
  • Warehouse: Fast queries, structured only, expensive
  • Lakehouse: Balanced, modern, recommended!

Learning: Architecture choice = cost vs speed trade-off! ๐Ÿ’ฐโšก

๐Ÿ’ผ Interview Questions

Q1: Data Lake storage podhum, why warehouse separate maintain pannanum?

A: Lake = raw, flexible storage. Warehouse = optimized for analytics (indexed, aggregated, cleaned). Data scientists lake use pannum (raw data experiment), business analysts warehouse (fast reports). Both complement pannum โ€“ not replacement!


Q2: Data Swamp โ€“ lake eppadi swamp aagum?

A: Governance illa na โ€“ metadata tracking illa, organization illa, quality checks illa. Same data duplicate versions, nobody know who owner, stale data mix. Solution: Data catalog, lineage tracking, quality gates, access controls, retention policies implement pannu!


Q3: Schema-on-read vs schema-on-write โ€“ trade-offs?

A: Write (Warehouse): Enforce at load โ€“ safe, fast queries, but rigid. Read (Lake): Load as-is, apply at read โ€“ flexible, slow queries. Modern: Lakehouse hybrid โ€“ store raw (on-read), but optional schema enforcement (on-write). Best!


Q4: Cost analysis โ€“ lake vs warehouse real numbers?

A: Storage: Lake $0.02/GB, Warehouse $5-50/GB. But query: Lake $5-50 per TB scanned, Warehouse $6+ per TB. Volume dependent โ€“ petabytes โ†’ lake wins, terabytes + frequent queries โ†’ warehouse. Lakehouse โ€“ balanced cost ๐Ÿ’ก


Q5: Migration โ€“ warehouse โ†’ lakehouse strategy?

A: Incremental! Not big bang. 1) Setup lakehouse (Delta/Iceberg) 2) Replicate critical tables first 3) Validate results 4) Gradually migrate consumers 5) Keep warehouse read-only during transition 6) Finally decommission. Takes 3-6 months, but zero downtime! Patience needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

โ“ Data Lake vs Data Warehouse โ€” simple difference?
Data Lake stores raw data in any format (structured, unstructured). Data Warehouse stores only cleaned, structured data optimized for analytics and reporting.
โ“ AI projects ku Data Lake ah Data Warehouse ah?
AI/ML projects ku usually Data Lake better โ€” raw data venum for training. Analytics/reporting ku Data Warehouse better. Modern approach: Lakehouse โ€” both benefits combine pannudhu.
โ“ Data Lakehouse na enna?
Lakehouse = Data Lake + Data Warehouse combined. Raw data store panna mudiyum, ACID transactions support pannum, SQL queries fast ah run aagum. Databricks, Delta Lake ivanga popular lakehouse solutions.
โ“ Data Lake "data swamp" aagama eppadi protect pannradhu?
Proper metadata management, data cataloging (Apache Atlas), access controls, data quality checks, and clear folder structure maintain pannunga. Governance illama lake swamp aaidum!
๐Ÿง Knowledge Check
Quiz 1 of 1

Schema-on-Read approach edhu use pannudhu?

0 of 1 answered