Batch vs real-time
Introduction
Oru scenario imagine pannunga ā nee bank la irukka. š¦
Scenario 1: Month end la bank un account oda full statement generate pannudhu. All transactions oru batch la process. ā Batch Processing
Scenario 2: Nee suspicious transaction pannaa, INSTANTLY un phone la alert varudhu. ā Real-time Processing
Both important! But different purposes ku different approaches. Indha article la batch vs real-time processing clear ah purinjidam ā with AI context! ā”
Batch vs Real-Time: Core Concepts
Batch Processing š¦
- Data accumulate aagudhu over time
- Scheduled time la ALL data oru batch la process
- Example: Daily report generation at midnight
- Think: Washing machine ā clothes collect panni, once run pannudhu
Real-Time (Stream) Processing ā”
- Data arrive aagum bodhe process aagudhu
- Continuous, event-by-event processing
- Example: Fraud alert within milliseconds of transaction
- Think: Running tap water ā continuous flow, instant use
Key Difference:
- Batch = Wait, collect, process together
- Real-time = Process immediately as it comes
Both approaches data engineering la essential. AI systems both use pannum depending on the need! šÆ
Analogy: Bus vs Auto Rickshaw
Chennai transport analogy! š
š Batch = Government Bus
- Wait pannum ā schedule follow pannum (every 30 min)
- Lots of passengers collect aagum, then oru trip la ellaarum pogum
- Cost effective ā per person cheap
- But delay irukku ā 30 min wait pannanum
- Predictable, reliable, handles large volumes
šŗ Real-time = Auto Rickshaw
- Instantly available ā no waiting
- One passenger, one trip ā immediate departure
- Expensive per trip
- But super fast ā no delay!
- On-demand, flexible, low latency
š Micro-batch = Uber Pool
- Small groups collect aagum (2-3 passengers)
- Short wait (2-5 min), then go
- Balance between cost and speed
- Near real-time approach!
Most companies use ALL THREE depending on the use case. š”
Batch vs Real-Time Architecture
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā ā BATCH vs REAL-TIME ARCHITECTURE ā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā⤠ā ā ā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā ā ā ā BATCH PROCESSING ā ā ā ā Data Sources ā Storage ā Scheduled ā ā ā ā [MySQL,CSV] [S3/Lake] Processing ā ā ā ā [Spark/dbt] ā ā ā ā ā Data Warehouse ā ā ā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā ā ā ā ā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā ā ā ā REAL-TIME PROCESSING ā ā ā ā Events ā Message Queue ā Stream ā ā ā ā [Clicks] [Kafka] Processor ā ā ā ā [Flink/Spark] ā ā ā ā ā Real-time Store/API ā ā ā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā ā ā ā ā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā ā ā ā LAMBDA (BOTH = Batch + Real-time) ā ā ā ā Speed Layer āāāāāāā ā ā ā ā Batch Layer āāāāāāā¼āāā¶ Serving Layer ā ā ā ā (Merged results) ā ā ā ā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā ā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Detailed Comparison
Full comparison table:
| Feature | Batch | Real-Time | Micro-Batch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latency | Minutes to hours | Milliseconds | Seconds |
| Data volume | Very large | Event by event | Small batches |
| Complexity | Simple | Complex | Medium |
| Cost | Lower | Higher | Medium |
| Tools | Spark, dbt, Airflow | Kafka, Flink | Spark Streaming |
| Error handling | Easier (rerun batch) | Harder (can't undo) | Medium |
| Use case | Reports, ML training | Alerts, fraud | Near-real-time |
| Throughput | Very high | Medium | High |
| State management | Easy | Complex | Medium |
| Testing | Straightforward | Challenging | Medium |
Rule of thumb:
- Need it NOW? ā Real-time ā”
- Need it TODAY? ā Batch š¦
- Need it in a FEW SECONDS? ā Micro-batch š
Batch vs Real-Time in AI/ML
AI systems la both approaches eppadi use aagudhu:
Batch in AI š¦
- Model Training: Historical data la model train ā always batch
- Feature computation: Aggregate features (avg spend last 30 days) ā batch
- Model evaluation: Test accuracy on large datasets ā batch
- Data labeling: Bulk annotation of training data ā batch
- Example: Netflix ā nightly batch job la recommendation model retrain
Real-Time in AI ā”
- Model Inference: User request ku instant prediction ā real-time
- Feature computation: Current session features (pages viewed NOW) ā real-time
- Anomaly detection: Detect fraud AS it happens ā real-time
- Personalization: Dynamic content based on live behavior ā real-time
- Example: Google Search ā real-time ranking as you type
Best Practice: Batch training + Real-time serving = Most common AI pattern!
Train model with batch data, serve predictions in real-time. š
Prompt: Choose the Right Approach
Real-World Use Cases
Practical use cases:
Pure Batch š¦
- š Monthly business reports
- š§ ML model retraining (weekly/daily)
- š§ Sending daily digest emails
- š° Payroll processing
- š Data warehouse refresh
Pure Real-Time ā”
- šØ Fraud detection (banking)
- š„ Patient vital monitoring
- š Live location tracking (Uber/Ola)
- š¬ Chat message delivery
- š® Online gaming state sync
Hybrid (Both) š
- š E-commerce recommendations (batch train + real-time serve)
- š± Social media feed (batch ranking + real-time new posts)
- š Search engines (batch index + real-time query)
- šŗ Video streaming (batch encoding + real-time adaptive bitrate)
- š¦ Banking (batch reports + real-time alerts)
Challenges & Trade-offs
Each approach oda challenges:
ā ļø Batch Challenges
- Data staleness ā results always "old" by hours
- Large resource spike during batch window
- If batch fails, entire day's data stuck
- Not suitable for time-sensitive decisions
ā ļø Real-Time Challenges
- Complex to build, debug, and maintain
- Expensive ā always-on compute resources
- Ordering guarantees hard (which event came first?)
- State management nightmare (what if system crashes mid-stream?)
- Exactly-once processing very difficult
ā ļø Hybrid Challenges
- Double the infrastructure, double the cost
- Keeping batch and real-time results consistent is HARD
- More moving parts = more failure points
- Team needs skills in both paradigms
š” Pro tip: Start with batch. Add real-time ONLY when business TRULY needs it. Don't over-engineer! šÆ
Tools Comparison
Batch and Real-time tools:
| Category | Batch Tools | Real-Time Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Processing | Apache Spark | Apache Flink |
| Processing | dbt | Kafka Streams |
| Processing | Pandas | Apache Storm |
| Orchestration | Apache Airflow | ā (event-driven) |
| Messaging | ā | Apache Kafka |
| Messaging | ā | AWS Kinesis |
| Messaging | ā | Google Pub/Sub |
| Storage | Data Warehouse | Redis, Druid |
| Cloud | AWS Glue | AWS Lambda |
| Cloud | GCP Dataproc | GCP Dataflow |
| Hybrid | Spark Structured Streaming (both!) |
Beginner path:
- Learn batch first: Pandas ā Spark ā Airflow
- Then real-time: Kafka ā Flink basics
- Advanced: Lambda/Kappa architecture šÆ
Hands-On: Experience Both
Both approaches practically try pannunga:
Batch Exercise š¦ (30 min)
- Download a large CSV (>100K rows)
- Write Python script to process in one batch
- Measure: Time taken, memory used
- Schedule with cron:
0 2 * * * python batch_etl.py
Real-Time Exercise ā” (1 hour)
- Install Kafka locally (Docker makes it easy)
- Create a producer that sends events every second
- Create a consumer that processes each event
- Observe: Events processed immediately as they arrive!
Compare š
- Process same 100K records: batch (one shot) vs streaming (one by one)
- Notice: Batch faster for bulk, streaming faster for each individual record
- This hands-on experience teaches more than 10 articles! šŖ
Mini Project: Stock price alerting system
- Batch: Calculate daily averages
- Real-time: Alert if price drops > 5% in a minute
ā Key Takeaways
Summary:
ā Batch = Collect and process together (bus analogy)
ā Real-time = Process immediately (auto rickshaw analogy)
ā Micro-batch = Small frequent batches (Uber Pool analogy)
ā AI pattern = Batch training + Real-time serving
ā Start with batch ā add real-time only when needed
ā Lambda Architecture = Batch + Real-time merged
ā Most modern systems use hybrid approach
Next article: "Data Pipelines Deep Dive" ā automated data flow systems build panra art paapom! šÆ
Prompt: Design a Hybrid System
š š® Mini Challenge
Challenge: Build Both Batch and Real-Time Processing
Compare pannu hands-on ā batch vs streaming:
Batch Setup (30 min):
- CSV file 10,000 rows (stock prices historical data)
- Pandas script ezhudhu:
- Time measure pannu
Real-Time Setup (30 min):
- Docker la Kafka local setup (docker-compose use)
- Producer: every second stock price send pannu
- Consumer: real-time price process pannu
- Latency measure pannu
Compare:
- Batch: 100K records 30 seconds (3,300 recs/sec)
- Real-time: Per-record milliseconds (instant)
- Batch cheaper, real-time responsive ā trade-off clear aaidum!
Learning: Both valuable ā use case decide pannum! š”
š¼ Interview Questions
Q1: Batch vs real-time ā use cases sona, practical difference enna?
A: Batch: Collections of events process oru time (hourly, daily). Real-time: Events process as they arrive. Example: banking transactions ā daily settlement batch, but fraud detection real-time. Different latency requirements, different architectures, different costs!
Q2: Batch system la hourly batches 2 hours edukudhu, but pipeline fail aana data loss risk?
A: Yes! Checkpoint/restart logic venum. Last successful offset track pannu. Fail aana, last checkpoint la irundhu restart pannu. Idempotency ensure pannu ā same batch twice run aanalum duplicate records varakoodadhu. Real-time la more complex!
Q3: Real-time system complex irukku, naan batch dhaan use panna choice. Disadvantage?
A: Stale data. Batch complete aagumbodhu decision too late. Example: Fraud transaction detected 3 hours later ā money already transferred! Critical use cases ku real-time needed. But batch simpler, cheaper ā 90% cases batch podhum!
Q4: Streaming data ever-increasing ā how to handle volume?
A: Consumer group parallel processing (Kafka like). Multiple workers independently consume. Backpressure handle (buffer, sample, drop, scale). Monitoring consumer lag (bottleneck identify). Sometimes micro-batch (frequent small batches) better compromise than true streaming!
Q5: Lambda Architecture (batch + streaming) ā implement panna complex?
A: Very complex! Two separate systems maintain pannanum (duplicate logic). Merging batch and stream results tricky (timestamp skew, late arrivals). Modern trend: Kappa (streaming only) or Unified engines (Spark, Flink) support both natively. Over-engineer avoid pannunga ā start batch, add real-time if truly needed!
Frequently Asked Questions
Which scenario is BEST suited for real-time processing?