← Back|GENAI›Section 1/18

0 of 18 completed

AI Agents intro

Advanced⏱ 18 min read📅 Updated: 2026-02-21

🎯 Beyond Chat: AI That Actually DOES Things

Imagine pannunga — nee boss kitta solra: "Next quarter budget report prepare pannu." Boss enna pannuvaanga?

Bad employee (Regular Chatbot):

"Budget report prepare pannanum na, first financial data collect pannanum, then Excel la organize pannanum..." — process EXPLAIN pannuvaanga but actually DO pannaadhaa! 😤

Good employee (AI Agent):

Finance team kitta email anuppi data vaanguvanga
Last quarter report open pannittu template eduppanga
Numbers calculate pannuvanga
Charts create pannuvanga
Report draft pannuvanga
Review ku un inbox la send pannuvanga

Paattheenga vithyaasam? One explains, the other EXECUTES. That's the difference between a chatbot and an AI Agent.

AI Agent = LLM + Tools + Autonomous Decision Making

Regular LLM: "Here's how you could search the web for..."

AI Agent: *Actually searches the web, reads results, synthesizes answer* ✅

2025-26 la AI Agents is THE hottest topic in AI. OpenAI, Google, Anthropic — ellarum agent frameworks build pannuraaanga. Why? Because the jump from "AI that talks" to "AI that works" is MASSIVE.

Indha article la cover pannuvom:

Agent architecture — eppadi think pannum, eppadi act pannum
ReAct pattern — the brain behind agents
Tool use — web search, code execution, API calls
Multi-agent systems — team of AI agents working together
Real code examples — build un own agent
Safety & guardrails — agents go wrong aagaamal eppadi prevent pannum

📚 Agent Architecture: Think → Plan → Act → Observe

AI Agent-oda core loop is simple — TPAO cycle:

Think → What should I do? What's the current state?

Plan → Which tool should I use? What's my next step?

Act → Execute the tool/action

Observe → What was the result? Am I done?

Agent Components:

Component	Role	Example
Brain (LLM)	Reasoning & decision making	GPT-4, Claude
Memory	Stores conversation & context	Chat history, vector store
Tools	External capabilities	Web search, calculator, APIs
Planning	Task decomposition	Break big goal into steps
Execution	Run actions	Call APIs, write files

How an agent answers "What's the weather in Chennai and should I carry an umbrella?":

code

Thought: I need to find Chennai's current weather. Let me use the weather tool.
Action: weather_tool("Chennai")
Observation: Chennai - 32°C, 80% humidity, thunderstorms expected afternoon

Thought: There are thunderstorms expected. I should recommend an umbrella.
Action: None needed, I can answer now.

Answer: Chennai la ippo 32°C irukku, but afternoon thunderstorms expected! 
        Definitely umbrella eduthukongo! ☂️

Key difference from regular prompting: The LLM DECIDES to call the weather tool. Nobody told it to. It analyzed the question, realized it needs current data, chose the right tool, called it, interpreted results, and answered. Autonomous decision-making — that's what makes it an agent!

Agent ≠ pre-programmed workflow. A workflow says "always do step 1, then step 2." An agent says "given the situation, what's the best next step?" Agents are dynamic, not scripted.

🏗️ Agent Architecture Diagram

🏗️ Architecture Diagram

```
AI Agent Architecture — The Agentic Loop
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

                    ┌─────────────────────┐
                    │     USER GOAL       │
                    │ "Book a flight to   │
                    │  Delhi under ₹5000" │
                    └──────────┬──────────┘
                               │
                               ▼
              ┌────────────────────────────────┐
              │         AGENT BRAIN (LLM)       │
              │                                 │
              │  ┌───────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
              │  │  THINK    │ │   MEMORY    │ │
              │  │ Reasoning │ │ Past steps, │ │
              │  │ What next?│ │ context     │ │
              │  └─────┬─────┘ └─────────────┘ │
              │        │                        │
              │  ┌─────▼─────┐                  │
              │  │   PLAN    │                  │
              │  │ Pick tool │                  │
              │  │ & params  │                  │
              │  └─────┬─────┘                  │
              └────────┼────────────────────────┘
                       │
            ┌──────────▼──────────┐
            │    TOOL EXECUTOR    │
            │                     │
  ┌─────────┼─────────────────────┼─────────┐
  │         │                     │         │
  ▼         ▼         ▼          ▼         ▼
┌─────┐ ┌───────┐ ┌───────┐ ┌───────┐ ┌──────┐
│ Web │ │ Code  │ │ API   │ │ File  │ │ DB   │
│Search│ │Runner │ │Caller │ │System │ │Query │
└──┬──┘ └───┬───┘ └───┬───┘ └───┬───┘ └──┬───┘
   │        │        │         │        │
   └────────┴────────┴─────────┴────────┘
                     │
              ┌──────▼──────┐
              │  OBSERVE    │
              │  Result OK? │
              │  Goal met?  │
              └──────┬──────┘
                     │
              ┌──────▼──────┐
         NO   │  DONE?      │  YES → Final Answer
         ├────│  Goal met?  │────────────────────▶ 📤
         │    └─────────────┘
         │
         └──────▶ Back to THINK (loop continues)
```

**Agent keeps looping** — Think → Plan → Act → Observe — until goal is met or max iterations reached.

🧠 ReAct Pattern: Reasoning + Acting

ReAct (Yao et al., 2022) is THE most important agent pattern. It interleaves reasoning (chain-of-thought) with actions (tool use).

ReAct Format:

code

Thought: [What I'm thinking / reasoning]
Action: [tool_name(parameters)]
Observation: [Result from tool]
... (repeat)
Thought: [I now know the answer]
Answer: [Final response]

Real Example — "Compare NVIDIA and AMD stock prices this week":

code

Thought: I need current stock prices for both NVIDIA and AMD. 
         Let me search for NVIDIA first.
Action: web_search("NVIDIA stock price today 2026")
Observation: NVIDIA (NVDA) trading at $892.45, up 2.3% this week

Thought: Got NVIDIA price. Now let me get AMD's price.
Action: web_search("AMD stock price today 2026")
Observation: AMD (AMD) trading at $178.30, down 1.1% this week

Thought: I have both prices. Let me compare.
         NVIDIA: $892.45 (+2.3% weekly)
         AMD: $178.30 (-1.1% weekly)
         NVIDIA is outperforming AMD this week.

Answer: This week NVIDIA stock $892.45 irukku (+2.3% up), 
        AMD $178.30 (-1.1% down). NVIDIA clearly outperforming 
        AMD this week — mainly due to new data center chip 
        announcement impact.

Why ReAct works:

Transparent reasoning — nee agent-oda thought process paakkalaam
Error recovery — oru tool fail aana, agent think pannittu alternative try pannum
Grounded answers — tool results la based, not hallucination
Debuggable — which step la wrong aachunu easy-a identify pannalaam

Without ReAct (just acting): Agent blindly calls tools without thinking → wrong tools, wrong order, wasted calls

Without ReAct (just thinking): Agent reasons well but can't access real-time info → outdated/hallucinated answers

ReAct = Best of both worlds 🧠🔧

🔧 Tool Use: Giving AI Superpowers

Tools transform LLMs from "text generators" to "capable workers." Let's see how tool use works:

OpenAI Function Calling (Tool Use):

python

from openai import OpenAI
import json

client = OpenAI()

# Define tools the agent can use
tools = [
    {
        "type": "function",
        "function": {
            "name": "get_weather",
            "description": "Get current weather for a city",
            "parameters": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "city": {"type": "string", "description": "City name"},
                    "unit": {"type": "string", "enum": ["celsius", "fahrenheit"]}
                },
                "required": ["city"]
            }
        }
    },
    {
        "type": "function",
        "function": {
            "name": "search_flights",
            "description": "Search for flights between cities",
            "parameters": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "origin": {"type": "string"},
                    "destination": {"type": "string"},
                    "date": {"type": "string"},
                    "max_price": {"type": "number"}
                },
                "required": ["origin", "destination", "date"]
            }
        }
    }
]

# Agent loop
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Book cheapest flight Chennai to Delhi tomorrow, and tell me Delhi weather"}]

while True:
    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model="gpt-4o",
        messages=messages,
        tools=tools
    )
    
    msg = response.choices[0].message
    
    if msg.tool_calls:
        for call in msg.tool_calls:
            # Execute the tool (your implementation)
            result = execute_tool(call.function.name, 
                                 json.loads(call.function.arguments))
            messages.append(msg)
            messages.append({
                "role": "tool",
                "tool_call_id": call.id,
                "content": json.dumps(result)
            })
    else:
        print(msg.content)  # Final answer
        break

Common Agent Tools:

Tool	What It Does	Example
Web Search	Search internet	Google, Bing, Tavily
Code Interpreter	Run Python code	Calculate, analyze data
File Operations	Read/write files	Parse PDFs, create CSVs
API Caller	Hit external APIs	Weather, flights, CRM
Database Query	Run SQL queries	Customer lookup
Email Sender	Send emails	Notifications, reports
Browser	Navigate websites	Fill forms, scrape data

Key insight: The LLM itself doesn't execute tools — it decides which tool to call and with what parameters. Your code executes the actual tool and returns results. LLM is the brain, tools are the hands. 🧠✋

💡 Analogy: AI Agent = Smart Office Assistant

💡 Tip

Think of an AI Agent as a new smart office assistant:

Regular AI (Chatbot) = Receptionist:

"How can I help you?" → You ask a question → They answer from memory → Done. They sit at the desk and respond. That's it.

AI Agent = Executive Assistant:

You say "Organize a team dinner for 10 people next Friday."

The EA doesn't just say "Here's how to organize a dinner." They:

1. Think: Need restaurant, budget, dietary restrictions, RSVPs

2. Check calendar: Is Friday free for everyone? (tool: calendar)

3. Ask team: Any dietary restrictions? (tool: email/slack)

4. Search: Best restaurants near office for 10 people (tool: search)

5. Compare: Price, reviews, availability (tool: reasoning)

6. Book: Make reservation (tool: API/phone)

7. Notify: Send invite to everyone (tool: email)

8. Report: "Done! Booked at Saravana Bhavan, 7 PM, ₹500 per head" ✅

The EA uses MULTIPLE tools, makes DECISIONS at each step, handles UNEXPECTED situations (restaurant full? → try next one), and doesn't stop until the GOAL is met.

That's exactly what an AI Agent does — autonomous, multi-step, tool-using, goal-oriented execution. Not just answering questions, but completing tasks. 🎯

One more parallel: A great EA learns your preferences over time (memory). "Boss always prefers South Indian food, vegetarian, and early evening slots." AI Agents can do this too with persistent memory!

👥 Multi-Agent Systems: Team of AI Agents

One agent is powerful. Multiple agents working together is game-changing.

Multi-Agent Concept: Instead of one agent doing everything, create specialized agents that collaborate.

Example — Content Creation Pipeline:

code

🔍 Research Agent → Searches web, finds data, facts
✍️ Writer Agent → Creates draft using research
🎨 Editor Agent → Reviews, fixes grammar, improves flow
📊 SEO Agent → Optimizes keywords, meta descriptions
✅ QA Agent → Final quality check

Research Agent: "Here are 10 key facts about AI in healthcare..."
      ↓
Writer Agent: "Draft article ready: 'AI is Revolutionizing Healthcare...'"
      ↓
Editor Agent: "Fixed 3 grammar issues, restructured paragraph 4..."
      ↓
SEO Agent: "Added keyword density for 'AI healthcare', improved H2 tags..."
      ↓
QA Agent: "Approved! All facts verified, no hallucinations detected." ✅

Popular Multi-Agent Frameworks:

Framework	By	Best For	Complexity
CrewAI	Community	Role-based agent teams	Medium
AutoGen	Microsoft	Conversational agents	Medium
LangGraph	LangChain	Complex workflows	High
OpenAI Swarm	OpenAI	Lightweight handoffs	Low

python

# CrewAI Example — Simple Multi-Agent
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew

researcher = Agent(
    role="Senior Research Analyst",
    goal="Find comprehensive data on the given topic",
    backstory="Expert at finding and analyzing information",
    tools=[web_search_tool],
    llm="gpt-4o"
)

writer = Agent(
    role="Content Writer", 
    goal="Write engaging articles based on research",
    backstory="Skilled writer who makes complex topics simple",
    llm="gpt-4o"
)

research_task = Task(
    description="Research AI trends in India for 2026",
    agent=researcher,
    expected_output="Detailed research notes with sources"
)

writing_task = Task(
    description="Write a 1000-word article based on the research",
    agent=writer,
    expected_output="Complete article in Tanglish",
    context=[research_task]  # Uses research output
)

crew = Crew(agents=[researcher, writer], tasks=[research_task, writing_task])
result = crew.kickoff()

Multi-agent is like a company — each agent is a specialist. Instead of one person doing everything, you have a team where each member excels at their role. 🏢

📐 Agent Design Patterns

Different problems need different agent architectures. Common patterns:

1. Single Agent + Tools (Simplest)

code

User → Agent → [Tool1, Tool2, Tool3] → Answer

Best for: Simple tasks, chatbots with capabilities

2. Chain Pattern (Sequential)

code

Agent1 → Agent2 → Agent3 → Final Output

Best for: Pipelines (research → write → review)

3. Supervisor Pattern (Hierarchical)

code

        Supervisor Agent
       /       |        \
   Worker1  Worker2  Worker3

Best for: Complex tasks needing coordination. Supervisor decides which worker to call.

4. Debate Pattern (Adversarial)

code

Agent A (proposes) ↔ Agent B (critiques) → Consensus

Best for: Decision making, reducing bias, quality improvement

5. Swarm Pattern (Dynamic)

code

Agent pool — dynamically assigned based on need
Handoff between agents as conversation evolves

Best for: Customer support (handoff from general → specialist)

Pattern Selection Guide:

Pattern	Complexity	Reliability	Speed	Use Case
Single Agent	Low	High	Fast	Simple tasks
Chain	Medium	Medium	Slow	Content pipelines
Supervisor	High	High	Medium	Complex orchestration
Debate	Medium	Very High	Slow	Critical decisions
Swarm	High	Medium	Fast	Dynamic conversations

Pro tip: Start with Single Agent + Tools. Pinna performance or complexity issues vantha, multi-agent patterns consider pannu. Over-engineering avoid pannu — simple agents are easier to debug! 🎯

📝 Agent System Prompt Template

📋 Copy-Paste Prompt

**Effective Agent System Prompt:**

```
You are an AI Agent with access to the following tools:

TOOLS:
1. web_search(query: string) - Search the internet for current information
2. calculator(expression: string) - Evaluate mathematical expressions
3. send_email(to: string, subject: string, body: string) - Send emails
4. read_file(path: string) - Read file contents

RULES:
1. Always THINK before acting — explain your reasoning
2. Use tools ONLY when needed — don't search if you already know
3. If a tool fails, try an alternative approach
4. Never make up information — use tools to verify facts
5. If you cannot complete the task, explain what's blocking you
6. Maximum 10 tool calls per task — be efficient

FORMAT:
Thought: [Your reasoning about what to do next]
Action: [tool_name(params)] OR "No action needed"
Observation: [Result from tool - filled by system]
... repeat ...
Final Answer: [Your complete response to the user]

Remember: You are an autonomous agent. Break complex goals into steps 
and execute them. Don't just explain — DO.
```

**Key elements:**
- Clear tool descriptions with parameters
- Explicit rules/guardrails
- Reasoning format (ReAct-style)
- Iteration limits (prevent infinite loops)
- Fail-safe instructions

🎯 Real-World Agent Use Cases

AI Agents are being deployed across industries. Real examples:

Use Case	Agent Type	Tools Used	Impact
Devin (AI SWE)	Coding agent	Terminal, browser, editor	Writes & deploys code autonomously
Auto-GPT	General agent	Web, file, code	Autonomous task completion
Customer Support	Service agent	CRM, knowledge base, email	60% ticket resolution without humans
Data Analysis	Analyst agent	SQL, Python, charts	Hours of analysis → minutes
Sales Outreach	SDR agent	CRM, email, LinkedIn	Personalized outreach at scale
Code Review	Review agent	Git, linter, tests	Automated PR reviews
Travel Planning	Booking agent	Flights, hotels, maps	End-to-end trip planning
Research	Research agent	Web, papers, citations	Literature review automation

Indian Startup Examples:

Startup	Agent Use Case	Status
Ema (Bengaluru)	Universal AI employee	$25M raised
Composio (Bengaluru)	Agent tool integrations	100+ integrations
Relevance AI	No-code agent builder	Growing fast

Real scenario — How an agent handles customer support:

code

Customer: "My order #12345 hasn't arrived, it's been 2 weeks!"

Agent Thought: Need to check order status first.
Action: check_order_status("12345")
Observation: Order shipped Jan 15, stuck at Mumbai hub since Jan 20

Agent Thought: Order is stuck. Need to check if I can escalate.
Action: create_support_ticket("12345", "Shipment stuck at Mumbai hub")
Observation: Ticket #T-789 created, estimated resolution 2 days

Agent Thought: I should also check if customer is eligible for compensation.
Action: check_compensation_policy("delayed_shipment", days=14)
Observation: Eligible for ₹200 credit for delays >7 days

Final Answer: "Sorry for the delay! Your order is stuck at Mumbai hub. 
I've created ticket #T-789 and it'll be resolved in 2 days. 
I've also added ₹200 credit to your account for the inconvenience." ✅

3 tool calls, fully resolved, no human needed! That's agent power. 🚀

⚠️ Agent Risks & Safety Guardrails

⚠️ Warning

AI Agents are powerful but DANGEROUS without guardrails!

1. Infinite Loops 🔄

Agent gets stuck: "I need to search" → search fails → "Let me try again" → fails → repeat forever. Fix: Set max_iterations (e.g., 10) and force stop.

2. Wrong Tool Calls

Agent decides to send email with wrong content, delete files, or call production APIs with bad data. Fix: Human-in-the-loop for destructive actions. Never give agents write/delete access without approval.

3. Hallucinated Actions

Agent "pretends" to call a tool and makes up the result instead of actually calling it. Fix: Always verify tool call was actually executed, don't trust agent's "observation" claims.

4. Cost Explosion 💸

Each agent step = LLM API call. Complex task with 20 steps × GPT-4 = $0.50+ per task. Multi-agent with debate = $5+ per task. Fix: Use cheaper models for simple steps, set cost budgets.

5. Security Risks 🔐

Agent with web access could be tricked by prompt injection in websites. Agent with code execution could run malicious code. Fix: Sandbox all tool executions, validate all inputs/outputs.

6. Unpredictable Behavior

Same prompt, different runs = different tool calls, different results. Non-deterministic. Fix: Temperature=0, detailed system prompts, evaluation pipelines.

Safety Checklist:

- ✅ Maximum iteration limit (10-20)

- ✅ Cost budget per task

- ✅ Human approval for destructive actions

- ✅ Sandboxed code execution

- ✅ Input/output validation

- ✅ Logging all agent steps for audit

- ✅ Kill switch for runaway agents

🌍 Why AI Agents Are the Future

2025-2026 is the "Year of Agents." Here's why this matters for your career:

The evolution of AI interfaces:

2022: ChatGPT — text in, text out (conversational)
2023: GPT-4 + plugins — text + tools (capable)
2024: Custom GPTs, Assistants API — configurable agents
2025-26: Autonomous agents — goal in, results out (agentic)

Every major company is betting on agents:

OpenAI: "Agents are the killer app for AI" — Sam Altman
Google: Gemini Agents, Project Mariner (browser agent)
Anthropic: Claude computer use, tool use
Microsoft: Copilot agents across Office, GitHub
Apple: Siri with app-level agent actions

Job market impact:

Role	Without Agent Skills	With Agent Skills
AI Engineer	₹15-25 LPA	₹30-50 LPA
Full Stack Dev	₹12-20 LPA	₹20-35 LPA
Data Scientist	₹15-25 LPA	₹25-40 LPA

"Agent Engineer" is becoming a distinct role — companies hiring specifically for people who can design, build, and maintain AI agent systems.

What this means for you: If you can build reliable AI agents that actually complete tasks autonomously, you're in the top 5% of AI developers. Most developers can call an API — few can build a system that reasons, plans, uses tools, handles errors, and delivers results. That's the skill gap, and it's lucrative. 💰

✅ 📋 Key Takeaways

AI Agents — Remember These Points:

✅ Agent = LLM + Tools + Autonomous Loop — Not just chat, but think-plan-act-observe

✅ ReAct pattern is foundational — Interleave reasoning with tool use for reliable agents

✅ Tools give agents superpowers — Web search, code execution, APIs, databases

✅ Multi-agent > single agent for complex tasks — Specialized roles, collaborative execution

✅ Start simple — Single agent + 2-3 tools → then scale to multi-agent

✅ Safety is NON-NEGOTIABLE — Max iterations, human-in-loop, sandboxing, cost limits

✅ OpenAI function calling is the easiest way to start building agents

✅ CrewAI/LangGraph for production multi-agent systems

✅ Agent Engineer is a real job — High demand, high pay, few qualified people

✅ Debug by reading agent traces — Thought → Action → Observation logs tell you everything

🏁 🏆 Mini Challenge: Build Your First Agent

Challenge: Build a simple AI agent that can answer questions using web search!

Option 1: No-code (Easy)

Go to ChatGPT → Create a Custom GPT
Enable "Web Browsing" capability
System prompt: "You are a research agent. For every question, search the web first, then answer with sources."
Test with: "What are the top 5 AI startups in India in 2026?"

Option 2: Code (Intermediate)

python

# pip install openai tavily-python
from openai import OpenAI
from tavily import TavilyClient

openai = OpenAI()
tavily = TavilyClient(api_key="your-tavily-key")

def agent_loop(user_query, max_iterations=5):
    messages = [
        {"role": "system", "content": "You are a research agent. Use search tool when needed."},
        {"role": "user", "content": user_query}
    ]
    
    tools = [{
        "type": "function",
        "function": {
            "name": "web_search",
            "description": "Search the web",
            "parameters": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {"query": {"type": "string"}},
                "required": ["query"]
            }
        }
    }]
    
    for i in range(max_iterations):
        response = openai.chat.completions.create(
            model="gpt-4o-mini", messages=messages, tools=tools
        )
        msg = response.choices[0].message
        
        if not msg.tool_calls:
            return msg.content
        
        messages.append(msg)
        for call in msg.tool_calls:
            result = tavily.search(call.function.arguments)
            messages.append({
                "role": "tool",
                "tool_call_id": call.id,
                "content": str(result)
            })
    
    return "Max iterations reached"

print(agent_loop("What happened in tech news today?"))

Evaluation: Does your agent search before answering? Does it cite sources? Does it handle "I don't know" gracefully?

🎤 Interview Questions on AI Agents

Prepare for these agent-related interview questions:

Q1: "What's the difference between an AI agent and a chatbot?"

A: A chatbot responds to individual messages. An agent has a goal, can plan multi-step approaches, use external tools, maintain state across steps, and make autonomous decisions. Chatbot = reactive, Agent = proactive and autonomous.

Q2: "Explain the ReAct pattern and why it's important."

A: ReAct interleaves Reasoning (Thought) with Acting (tool calls). Each cycle: Think about what to do → Execute a tool → Observe the result → Decide next step. It's important because pure reasoning without tools leads to hallucination, and pure tool use without reasoning leads to wrong tool choices.

Q3: "How would you prevent an agent from going into an infinite loop?"

A: Set max_iterations limit, implement cost budgets, add timeout per step, detect repeated actions (same tool call twice = stop), and include a "give up gracefully" instruction in the system prompt.

Q4: "When would you use multi-agent vs single agent?"

A: Single agent for straightforward tasks (up to 5-7 steps). Multi-agent when: tasks need different expertise (research vs writing), you need quality checks (writer + reviewer), tasks can be parallelized, or the complexity exceeds what one agent prompt can handle.

Q5: "What are the security concerns with AI agents?"

A: Prompt injection via tool outputs (malicious websites), unauthorized actions (sending wrong emails), data leakage (agent sharing private data with tools), cost attacks (triggering expensive tool calls), and privilege escalation. Mitigations: sandbox everything, validate I/O, human-in-the-loop for critical actions, principle of least privilege for tool access.

💭 Final Thought

AI Agents represent the shift from "AI as a tool" to "AI as a teammate." Today you prompt AI. Tomorrow, you'll give it goals and it'll figure out the rest.

The best part? We're at the very beginning of this revolution. Building agent skills now is like learning web development in 2005 — early movers will dominate. Start simple, build real agents, and ride this wave! 🤖🚀

🛤️ Next Learning Path

Agents master pannaachu? Next steps:

Building AI Apps with APIs — Turn your agents into real products users can interact with
LangGraph Deep Dive — Complex agent workflows with state machines
AI Cost & Performance — Optimize agent costs (each step costs money!)
Computer Use Agents — Agents that control browsers and desktop apps
Agent Evaluation — How to test and benchmark agent reliability

❓ FAQ

❓ What is an AI Agent vs a regular chatbot?

A chatbot responds to messages. An AI Agent can THINK, PLAN, use TOOLS (search, code, APIs), and take ACTIONS autonomously. It decides what steps to take to accomplish a goal, not just respond to prompts.

❓ What is the ReAct pattern?

ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) is a pattern where the AI thinks step-by-step (Thought), decides what to do (Action), observes the result (Observation), and repeats until the task is complete. It combines chain-of-thought reasoning with tool use.

❓ Are AI Agents safe to use in production?

With proper guardrails, yes. But agents can make mistakes, call wrong tools, or enter infinite loops. Always add human-in-the-loop for critical actions, set maximum iteration limits, and validate tool outputs.

❓ What frameworks can I use to build AI Agents?

LangChain/LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen (Microsoft), and OpenAI Assistants API are popular. For simple agents, OpenAI function calling with a loop is sufficient. For complex multi-agent systems, LangGraph or CrewAI are recommended.

🧠Knowledge Check

Quiz 1 of 1

**ReAct pattern la "Observation" step enna pannum?**

0 of 1 answered

← Previous ByteFine-tuning vs Prompting Next Byte →Building AI apps using APIs

Courses

Learning Paths

Exam Prep

AI Agents intro

🎯 Beyond Chat: AI That Actually DOES Things

📚 Agent Architecture: Think → Plan → Act → Observe

🏗️ Agent Architecture Diagram

🧠 ReAct Pattern: Reasoning + Acting

🔧 Tool Use: Giving AI Superpowers

💡 Analogy: AI Agent = Smart Office Assistant

👥 Multi-Agent Systems: Team of AI Agents

📐 Agent Design Patterns

📝 Agent System Prompt Template

🎯 Real-World Agent Use Cases

⚠️ Agent Risks & Safety Guardrails

🌍 Why AI Agents Are the Future

✅ 📋 Key Takeaways

🏁 🏆 Mini Challenge: Build Your First Agent

🎤 Interview Questions on AI Agents

💭 Final Thought

🛤️ Next Learning Path

❓ FAQ