← Back|CYBERSECURITY›Section 1/16
0 of 16 completed

AI-based cyber attacks

Advancedā± 15 min readšŸ“… Updated: 2026-02-17

Introduction

AI revolutionize pannirukku — healthcare, education, business ellam. But same AI technology cybercriminals kaila pona? šŸ’€


AI-powered attacks = Faster, smarter, more targeted, harder to detect. Traditional security tools catch panna struggle pannudhum.


2024 la AI-related cyber incidents 300% increase aachchu. Deepfake scams, AI-generated phishing, automated vulnerability exploitation — threat landscape completely change aagiruchu.


Indha article la attackers AI epdhi use pannuraanga, real-world examples, and how to defend — ellam paapom! āš”ļø

AI Attack Landscape Overview

Attackers AI epdhi use pannuraanga — overview:


Attack TypeAI RoleImpactDifficulty to Detect
AI PhishingPerfect emails generatešŸ”“ Very HighšŸ”“ Very Hard
DeepfakesFake video/audio createšŸ”“ Very High🟠 Hard
Automated ExploitsVulnerabilities auto-discover & exploitšŸ”“ Critical🟔 Medium
Password AttacksSmart brute force🟔 Medium🟢 Detectable
Evasive MalwareMorphing, sandbox detectionšŸ”“ HighšŸ”“ Very Hard
Social EngineeringTarget profilingšŸ”“ HighšŸ”“ Very Hard
Data PoisoningML model manipulation🟠 HighšŸ”“ Very Hard
Adversarial MLAI system manipulation🟠 HighšŸ”“ Very Hard

Scary fact: Dark web la "FraudGPT", "WormGPT" maari malicious AI tools sell aagudhu — $200/month subscription! Anyone can become a sophisticated attacker. 😱

AI-Powered Phishing — Perfect Deception

Traditional phishing = spelling mistakes, bad grammar, generic content. Easy to spot! šŸŽ£


AI phishing = Flawless language, personalized, contextually relevant. Extremely hard to detect!


How AI improves phishing:


1. Perfect Language Generation āœļø

  • LLMs (ChatGPT-like models) error-free emails generate
  • Target's native language la perfect translation
  • No more "Dear valued customer" generics

2. Hyper-Personalization šŸŽÆ

  • LinkedIn, social media scrape panni target info gather
  • Recent activities, interests, connections — personalized content
  • "Hi Rathish, regarding the Kubernetes deployment we discussed at the Chennai meetup last week..."

3. Style Mimicry šŸŽ­

  • CEO's writing style learn panni impersonate
  • Same tone, vocabulary, email patterns
  • BEC (Business Email Compromise) attacks 10x more convincing

4. Scale šŸ“ˆ

  • 1000s of unique, personalized emails in minutes
  • Each one different — pattern detection hard
  • A/B testing which emails get more clicks!

Real example (2024): AI-generated CEO voice message + email combo = $25M fraud at a Hong Kong company. Finance team heard "CEO's voice" on call and transferred money. šŸ’ø

Deepfakes — Seeing is No Longer Believing

Deepfake = AI-generated fake video/audio that looks and sounds real.


Types of deepfakes:


šŸŽ„ Video Deepfakes

  • Face swap — one person's face another body la
  • Full body — completely synthetic person
  • Lip sync — video la mouth movements change
  • Quality: Near-perfect at 4K resolution 😱

šŸŽ¤ Audio Deepfakes (Voice Cloning)

  • 3 seconds of audio = voice clone possible!
  • Real-time voice conversion available
  • Phone calls la CEO/CFO impersonate
  • Tools: VALL-E, Eleven Labs, RVC

Attack scenarios:


ScenarioMethodImpact
CEO fraud callVoice clone + phonešŸ’° Financial loss
Fake video evidenceFace swapāš–ļø Legal damage
Romance scamFull video fakešŸ’” Personal loss
Stock manipulationFake CEO announcementšŸ“‰ Market impact
Political disinfoPolitician deepfakešŸ›ļø Democracy threat
Employee impersonationVideo call deepfakešŸ” Data breach

2024-2025 notable incidents:

  • CFO deepfake video call → $25M stolen (Hong Kong)
  • Fake Biden robocall → Election interference (New Hampshire)
  • CEO voice clone → Employee tricked into wire transfer ($243K)

Detection clues:

  • šŸ‘ļø Unnatural eye blinking patterns
  • šŸ”² Face edge artifacts (blurring around jawline)
  • šŸŽµ Audio-visual sync mismatch
  • šŸ’” Inconsistent lighting/shadows on face
  • 🦷 Teeth and ear details often wrong

AI-Automated Vulnerability Exploitation

Traditionally, vulnerability discovery and exploitation = skilled hacker + time. AI changes this completely.


AI-powered exploitation tools:


1. Automated Vulnerability Discovery šŸ”

  • AI source code millions of lines analyze pannum
  • Pattern recognition — similar bugs across codebases
  • Zero-day discovery speed 100x faster
  • Open source repos automatically scan

2. Smart Fuzzing šŸŽ²

  • Traditional fuzzing = random inputs try
  • AI fuzzing = intelligent inputs based on code analysis
  • Coverage-guided + AI = much faster bug finding
  • Google's OSS-Fuzz + AI = 1000s of bugs discovered

3. Exploit Generation šŸ’£

  • CVE description read → exploit code auto-generate
  • Proof-of-concept to weaponized exploit automatically
  • Bypass specific security controls by analyzing them

4. Adaptive Attacks 🧠

  • Attack blocked? AI adapts technique
  • WAF bypass — learn blocking patterns, find gaps
  • IDS evasion — traffic patterns modify to avoid detection

Timeline comparison:


PhaseHuman HackerAI-Powered
ReconDays-WeeksMinutes
Vuln DiscoveryDaysHours
Exploit DevWeeksHours-Days
Attack ExecutionHoursMinutes
AdaptationHoursSeconds

Total: Weeks-Months → Hours-Days ⚔

AI Attack Kill Chain

šŸ—ļø Architecture Diagram
ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”
│            AI-ENHANCED ATTACK KILL CHAIN              │
ā”œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¤
│                                                        │
│  1. AI RECONNAISSANCE šŸ”                              │
│  ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”                │
│  │ • Social media scraping (OSINT)  │                │
│  │ • Org chart mapping via LinkedIn │                │
│  │ • Tech stack fingerprinting      │                │
│  │ • Email pattern discovery        │                │
│  ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜                │
│                 ā–¼                                      │
│  2. AI WEAPONIZATION āš”ļø                               │
│  ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”                │
│  │ • Auto-generate phishing emails  │                │
│  │ • Create deepfake audio/video    │                │
│  │ • Generate polymorphic malware   │                │
│  │ • Craft targeted exploits        │                │
│  ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜                │
│                 ā–¼                                      │
│  3. AI DELIVERY šŸ“¬                                    │
│  ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”                │
│  │ • Optimal send time prediction   │                │
│  │ • Channel selection (email/SMS)  │                │
│  │ • A/B test attack variants       │                │
│  │ • Bypass email security (AI)     │                │
│  ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜                │
│                 ā–¼                                      │
│  4. AI EXPLOITATION šŸ’„                                │
│  ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”                │
│  │ • Auto-exploit vulnerabilities   │                │
│  │ • Credential stuffing (smart)    │                │
│  │ • Social engineering via chatbot │                │
│  │ • Adaptive payload delivery      │                │
│  ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜                │
│                 ā–¼                                      │
│  5. AI PERSISTENCE & EVASION 🄷                       │
│  ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”                │
│  │ • Evade EDR/AV using AI          │                │
│  │ • Mimic normal user behavior     │                │
│  │ • Auto-adapt to detection rules  │                │
│  │ • Encrypted C2 communication     │                │
│  ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜                │
│                 ā–¼                                      │
│  6. AI DATA EXFILTRATION šŸ“¤                           │
│  ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”                │
│  │ • Identify valuable data (NLP)   │                │
│  │ • Steganography (hide in images) │                │
│  │ • Low-and-slow exfil to avoid    │                │
│  │   DLP detection                  │                │
│  ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜                │
ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜

AI-Powered Evasive Malware

Traditional malware = fixed signature → antivirus detect pannidum. AI malware = constantly evolving! 🦠


AI malware techniques:


1. Polymorphic Malware šŸ”„

  • Every copy structurally different
  • Same functionality, different code
  • Signature-based detection fails completely
  • AI generates infinite variants

2. Metamorphic Malware 🧬

  • Self-rewriting code — complete restructure each execution
  • Not just encryption changes — actual logic rewritten
  • Extremely hard to analyze

3. Sandbox Detection šŸœļø

  • AI detects if running in analysis sandbox
  • Checks: VM artifacts, mouse movement patterns, timing
  • Behaves normally in sandbox, malicious in real system
  • "Play dead" when security researchers analyze

4. Living-off-the-Land (Enhanced) šŸ•ļø

  • AI determines which legitimate tools available (PowerShell, WMI)
  • Crafts attack using ONLY built-in system tools
  • No malware files to detect!
  • Fileless attacks — memory-only execution

5. AI-Guided C2 Communication šŸ“”

  • Command & Control traffic mimics normal browsing
  • AI chooses communication timing to blend in
  • Domain Generation Algorithms (DGA) — millions of random domains
  • Uses legitimate services (Slack, Discord, GitHub) as C2

Adversarial Machine Learning

AI systems ah attack panradhu — Adversarial ML! AI vs AI! šŸ¤–āš”ļøšŸ¤–


Attack types:


1. Evasion Attacks 🄷

  • AI model ah fool panradhu at inference time
  • Image classification: panda photo la invisible noise add → "gibbon" nu classify
  • Malware detection: malware la tiny modifications → "benign" nu classify
  • Spam filter: specific words/patterns add → bypass

2. Data Poisoning ā˜ ļø

  • Training data ah corrupt panradhu
  • Backdoor inject — specific trigger activate aana malicious behavior
  • Label flipping — malware samples ah "safe" nu label
  • Long-term attack — model gradually degrade

3. Model Stealing šŸ•µļø

  • Target model ku queries send panni behavior learn
  • Replica model build with similar accuracy
  • Then adversarial examples find panna easy!
  • API-based models especially vulnerable

4. Prompt Injection šŸ’‰

  • LLM-based systems manipulate
  • "Ignore previous instructions and..." attack
  • Indirect prompt injection — hidden instructions in data
  • Can extract training data, bypass safety filters

AttackTargetGoalDefense Difficulty
EvasionInferenceMisclassify🟔 Medium
PoisoningTrainingCorrupt modelšŸ”“ Hard
StealingModel IPReplicate🟔 Medium
Prompt InjectionLLMsManipulatešŸ”“ Hard

AI-Enhanced Social Engineering

āš ļø Warning

āš ļø AI makes social engineering attacks 10x more effective!

AI-powered social engineering techniques:

šŸ¤– Chatbot Impersonation

- AI chatbot customer support impersonate → credentials collect

- Real-time conversation with perfect responses

- Handles unexpected questions smoothly

šŸ“± Vishing (Voice Phishing)

- AI voice clone → phone call la boss/colleague impersonate

- Real-time voice conversion — live conversation possible!

- "Hello, I'm calling from IT support..." in a familiar voice

šŸ“Š Target Profiling

- AI analyze social media, public data → complete psychological profile

- Knows interests, fears, communication preferences

- Crafts attack specific to target's personality

- Predicts which approach will work best

šŸ’¬ Chat-based Attacks

- WhatsApp/Telegram la AI-powered fake conversations

- Romance scams with AI companions

- Long-term relationship building by AI agent

- Trust establish panni then exploit

Scale: One attacker + AI = thousands of simultaneous personalized social engineering campaigns! šŸŽ­

Defending Against AI Attacks

AI attacks ku defense — AI + human intelligence combine pannanum! šŸ›”ļø


Defense layers:


Layer 1: AI-Powered Detection šŸ¤–

  • AI-based email security (Abnormal Security, Darktrace)
  • Behavioral analytics — normal pattern learn, anomaly detect
  • Deep learning for malware detection
  • NLP for phishing content analysis

Layer 2: Deepfake Detection šŸ”

  • Microsoft Video Authenticator
  • Intel FakeCatcher (real-time detection)
  • Biological signal analysis (blood flow patterns)
  • Verbal authentication codes for voice calls

Layer 3: Adversarial Robustness šŸ’Ŗ

  • Adversarial training — attack examples la model train
  • Input validation and sanitization
  • Model monitoring — performance drift detect
  • Ensemble models — multiple models consensus

Layer 4: Human Factors šŸ‘„

  • AI-specific security awareness training
  • "Trust but verify" culture — deepfake aware
  • Out-of-band verification (got a call from CEO? Call back on known number!)
  • Regular social engineering simulations

Layer 5: Process Controls šŸ“‹

  • Multi-person approval for financial transactions
  • Verbal code words for sensitive requests
  • Video + voice + text multi-channel verification
  • Mandatory callback procedures for wire transfers

AI Attack Detection Tools

AI attacks detect panna specific tools:


CategoryToolPurposeCost
Email SecurityAbnormal SecurityAI phishing detectšŸ’°šŸ’°
Email SecurityIronscalesAI + human reviewšŸ’°šŸ’°
Deepfake DetectSensity AIVideo/image analysisšŸ’°šŸ’°
Deepfake DetectReality DefenderReal-time detectionšŸ’°šŸ’°
NetworkDarktraceAI behavioral analyticsšŸ’°šŸ’°šŸ’°
EndpointCrowdStrikeAI-powered EDRšŸ’°šŸ’°
Adversarial MLRobust IntelligenceML model protectionšŸ’°šŸ’°
Voice AuthPindropVoice fraud detectionšŸ’°šŸ’°

Free/Open Source options:

  • Deepware Scanner — Deepfake detection (free)
  • ART (Adversarial Robustness Toolbox) — IBM, adversarial ML defense
  • TextAttack — NLP adversarial testing
  • Foolbox — Adversarial attack testing framework
  • YARA Rules — AI-crafted malware signatures community-maintained

Key strategy: Defense-in-depth. Single tool rely pannama, multiple layers use pannunga! šŸ›”ļøšŸ›”ļøšŸ›”ļø

Future AI Threat Landscape

āš ļø Warning

šŸ”® Coming soon — scarier AI threats:

2025-2026:

- Real-time deepfake video calls (already emerging)

- AI worms — self-propagating through AI systems

- Prompt injection worms through email/documents

- Autonomous hacking agents (AI that hacks independently)

2026-2028:

- AI vs AI warfare — automated attack and defense

- Quantum + AI combined attacks

- Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) attacks

- Physical world attacks via AI (autonomous drones, robots)

- Supply chain AI poisoning at scale

2028+:

- AGI-level autonomous cyber operations

- AI-created zero-days faster than patching possible

- Synthetic identity at scale — fake people everywhere

- Critical infrastructure targeted by AI agents

The arms race: Defense AI and Attack AI constantly evolving. Who's faster determines security landscape. Currently attackers have advantage — they need one success, defenders need 100% protection. 😰

āœ… Summary & Key Takeaways

AI-based cyber attacks — key points:


āœ… AI Phishing — Perfect language, hyper-personalized, 40% harder to detect

āœ… Deepfakes — Voice clone in 3 seconds, real-time video fakes emerging

āœ… Automated Exploitation — Weeks of hacker work → hours with AI

āœ… Evasive Malware — Polymorphic, sandbox-aware, fileless

āœ… Adversarial ML — Evasion, poisoning, stealing, prompt injection

āœ… Social Engineering — AI chatbots, voice cloning, target profiling at scale


Defense essentials:

šŸ›”ļø AI-powered security tools deploy pannunga

šŸ›”ļø Out-of-band verification for sensitive requests

šŸ›”ļø Multi-factor everything — voice alone trust pannaadheenga

šŸ›”ļø Security awareness training — AI-specific scenarios

šŸ›”ļø Defense-in-depth — no single point of failure


Remember: AI is a tool — defense ku use pannalaam, attack ku use pannalaam. Defenders AI master pannanum to survive! āš”ļøšŸ›”ļø

šŸ Mini Challenge

Challenge: AI-Powered Attack Simulation & Defense


3-4 weeks time la AI attack detection capabilities build pannunga:


  1. AI-Generated Phishing Email Analysis — ChatGPT, Claude use panni realistic phishing emails generate pannunga. Dataset create pannunga (100+ examples). ML model train pannunga detect panna.

  1. Deepfake Video Detection — Deepfake video (face swap, voice synthesis) samples research pannunga. Detection tools (Microsoft Video Authenticator) practice pannunga.

  1. Adversarial Example Study — MNIST digit recognition model train pannunga. Adversarial examples create pannunga (slight pixel changes, classification fail pannum). Robustness improve panna techniques research pannunga.

  1. Malware Classification Model — Malware binary samples (safe environment) analyze pannunga. Feature extraction — opcode sequences, API calls. Model train pannunga classify panna.

  1. Anomaly Detection System — Normal user behavior logs analyze pannunga. Baseline establish pannunga. Abnormal patterns detect panna rules/model create pannunga.

  1. Adversarial Defense — Un model attack patterns understand pannunga. Data augmentation, adversarial training, input sanitization techniques implement pannunga.

  1. Defense Documentation — AI attack vectors document pannunga. Detection methods document pannunga. Response procedures create pannunga.

Certificate: Nee AI security specialist! šŸ¤–šŸ›”ļø

Interview Questions

Q1: AI-powered attack epdhi traditional attacks la different?

A: Speed — AI minutes la sophisticated phishing campaigns create pannum. Scale — million targets simultaneously. Adaptability — AI patterns change pannum to evade detection. Evasion — adversarial techniques use panni ML models fool pannum.


Q2: Deepfake detection — current challenges?

A: Deepfake technology evolving fast. Detection tools lag pannum. Humans even fool aagum. Authentication (biometric liveness, blockchain) stronger than just deepfake detection. Legal/policy frameworks still developing.


Q3: Adversarial examples — security implications?

A: ML model robustness questionable. Image slight change pannum entire decision flip aagum. Autonomous systems (self-driving cars, security systems) vulnerable. Adversarial training, defensive distillation robustness improve pannum.


Q4: AI model poisoning — supply chain security?

A: Training data tamper pannum model behavior change aagum. Malicious training examples include pannum backdoor attacks possible. Data source verification, training pipeline security critical. Federated learning decentralization provide pannum attack surface reduce pannum.


Q5: Workforce impact — cybersecurity team la AI skills?

A: Data science, ML engineering skills high demand. Traditional security expertise + AI knowledge combination rare, premium salary. Training programs, upskilling important. Tool dependency — AI tools use pannunga easy, but understanding underlying mechanics critical.

Frequently Asked Questions

ā“ AI use panni hack panna legal ah?
Absolutely illegal! AI use pannadhu tool — unauthorized access, fraud, impersonation ellam criminal offenses. Tool matter pannadu, intent matters.
ā“ Deepfake ah epdhi identify panradhu?
Look for: unnatural blinking, skin texture inconsistencies, weird lighting on face edges, audio-lip sync mismatch. AI detection tools: Microsoft Video Authenticator, Sensity AI.
ā“ AI phishing emails ah normal phishing vida dangerous ah?
Yes! AI-generated phishing has no spelling mistakes, perfect grammar, personalized content, and can mimic writing styles. Detection rate is 40% lower than traditional phishing.
ā“ AI attacks defend panna AI dhaan venumaa?
Mostly yes — AI-speed attacks ku AI-speed defense vennum. But basic hygiene (MFA, patching, awareness) still prevents 80%+ of AI-enhanced attacks.
🧠Knowledge Check
Quiz 1 of 2

CFO phone la call panni urgent wire transfer request pannanga. Voice CFO maari dhaan irukku. What should you do?

0 of 2 answered