Agent communication basics
๐ฌ Introduction โ Agents Need to Talk!
Single agent alone work pannalaam. But multiple agents collaborate pannanum na, communication essential! ๐ค
Think of it like a team project:
- ๐จโ๐ผ Manager assigns tasks
- ๐ฉโ๐ป Developer builds features
- ๐งช Tester finds bugs
- ๐ Writer creates docs
They all need to communicate to succeed! Same for AI agents! ๐ค๐ฌ๐ค
Agent Communication = How agents share information, coordinate tasks, and collaborate to achieve goals.
This article covers:
- ๐จ Message passing fundamentals
- ๐ Communication patterns
- ๐ Protocols and standards
- ๐ค Coordination strategies
- โ ๏ธ Common pitfalls
๐จ Message Passing Fundamentals
Basic unit of agent communication = Message
Message Structure:
Message Types:
| Type | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| **Task Assignment** | Delegate work | "Research this topic" |
| **Task Result** | Return findings | "Here are the results" |
| **Status Update** | Progress report | "50% complete" |
| **Query** | Ask for info | "What's the deadline?" |
| **Response** | Answer query | "Deadline is Friday" |
| **Error** | Report problem | "API call failed" |
| **Coordination** | Synchronize | "Ready for next step" |
Every message should have: sender, receiver, type, content, timestamp! ๐จ
๐ Communication Patterns
Pattern 1: Request-Response ๐
Simple, synchronous. One asks, one answers.
Pattern 2: Publish-Subscribe ๐ข
One-to-many communication. Great for events.
Pattern 3: Broadcast ๐ก
One agent sends to all. For important announcements.
Pattern 4: Pipeline (Chain) โ๏ธ
Sequential processing. Each agent adds value.
Pattern 5: Blackboard ๐
Indirect communication via shared space.
| Pattern | Best For | Coupling |
|---|---|---|
| Request-Response | Direct queries | Tight |
| Pub-Sub | Event notifications | Loose |
| Broadcast | Team announcements | Loose |
| Pipeline | Sequential workflows | Medium |
| Blackboard | Collaborative work | Loose |
๐๏ธ Agent Communication Architecture
``` โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ COMMUNICATION LAYER โ โ โ โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ โ โ ๐ฌ MESSAGE BUS / BROKER โ โ โ โ Route โ Queue โ Prioritize โ Log โ โ โ โโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โโโโโโโผโโโโโโ โโโโโผโโโโโ โโโโผโโโโโโโ โ โ โ ๐จโ๐ผ Managerโ โ๐Researchโ โโ๏ธ Writer โ โ โ โ Agent โ โ Agent โ โ Agent โ โ โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โโโโโโโผโโโโโโโโโโโโโผโโโโโโโโโโโผโโโโโโโโ โ โ โ ๐ SHARED STATE / MEMORY โ โ โ โ Task Board โ Results โ Context โ โ โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ โ โ โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ โ โ ๐ MONITOR & LOGGING โ โ โ โ Message count โ Latency โ Errors โ โ โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ ```
๐ค Coordination Strategies
Multiple agents coordinate panna different strategies irukku:
1. Centralized Coordination ๐
- One manager agent controls everything
- Sub-agents report to manager
- Manager decides next steps
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Clear control | Single point of failure |
| Easy to track | Manager bottleneck |
| Predictable | Less flexible |
2. Decentralized Coordination ๐
- No single controller
- Agents negotiate with each other
- Consensus-based decisions
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| No bottleneck | Harder to track |
| Fault tolerant | Potential conflicts |
| Scalable | More complex |
3. Hybrid Coordination ๐
- Manager for high-level planning
- Peer-to-peer for execution details
- Best of both worlds!
Recommendation: Start with centralized (simpler), move to hybrid for production! ๐ฏ
๐ฌ Communication in Action โ Customer Support
Multi-Agent Customer Support System:
4 agents, 1 seamless response! โจ
๐ Communication Protocols
Agents communicate panna standardized protocols help pannum:
1. Natural Language Protocol ๐ฌ
- Agents chat in plain text
- Flexible but ambiguous
- Best for: Creative collaboration
2. Structured Message Protocol ๐
- Clear, unambiguous
- Best for: Tool-using agents
3. Function Calling Protocol ๐ง
- Agent A calls Agent B as a function
- Typed inputs/outputs
- Best for: Tight integration
4. Event-Driven Protocol ๐ก
- Loose coupling
- Best for: Scalable systems
| Protocol | Reliability | Flexibility | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Language | Low | High | Low |
| Structured Message | High | Medium | Medium |
| Function Calling | Very High | Low | Medium |
| Event-Driven | High | High | High |
โ ๏ธ Communication Challenges
Challenge 1: Context Loss ๐
Agent A knows something, but forgets to tell Agent B
*Fix:* Explicit context passing in every message
Challenge 2: Message Ordering ๐ข
Messages arrive out of order
*Fix:* Timestamps + sequence numbers + message queue
Challenge 3: Infinite Loops ๐
Agent A asks B, B asks A, A asks B...
*Fix:* Max message count per task, loop detection
Challenge 4: Conflicting Instructions โ๏ธ
Agent A says "use formal tone", Agent B says "use casual"
*Fix:* Priority hierarchy, manager as tiebreaker
Challenge 5: Information Overload ๐
Too many messages overwhelm agent's context window
*Fix:* Message summarization, relevance filtering
Challenge 6: Latency โฑ๏ธ
Each agent interaction adds latency
*Fix:* Parallel communication, async processing
Prevention checklist:
- โ Clear message format defined
- โ Max iterations per conversation set
- โ Context explicitly passed
- โ Error handling for communication failures
- โ Monitoring for unusual patterns
๐งช Try It โ Simulate Agent Communication
๐ ๏ธ Tools for Agent Communication
| Tool/Framework | Communication Style | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| **CrewAI** | Role-based delegation | Simple teams |
| **AutoGen** | Conversational | Chat-based collaboration |
| **LangGraph** | State-based routing | Complex workflows |
| **Swarm** | Lightweight handoffs | Simple agent switching |
| **RabbitMQ** | Message queue | Production messaging |
| **Redis Pub/Sub** | Event-driven | Real-time events |
| **gRPC** | Function calls | High-performance |
For beginners: CrewAI or AutoGen โ built-in agent communication! ๐
For production: LangGraph + Redis/RabbitMQ โ scalable and reliable! ๐ข
๐ก Communication Best Practices
1. Keep messages concise โ Essential info only, no filler
2. Use structured formats โ JSON > free text for reliability
3. Include context โ Don't assume other agent knows everything
4. Set timeouts โ Don't wait forever for a response
5. Log everything โ Debug communication issues easily
6. Idempotent messages โ Same message twice = same result
7. Acknowledge receipt โ Confirm message received before processing
8. Version your protocols โ Evolve without breaking existing agents
๐ Security in Agent Communication
Agent communication secure pannanum:
| Threat | Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| **Message tampering** | Altered instructions | Message signing |
| **Impersonation** | Fake agent sends messages | Authentication tokens |
| **Eavesdropping** | Sensitive data intercepted | Encryption (TLS) |
| **Injection** | Malicious prompts injected | Input validation |
| **DoS** | Flood of messages | Rate limiting |
Minimum security:
- โ Authenticate every agent (API keys/tokens)
- โ Validate all incoming messages
- โ Encrypt sensitive data in transit
- โ Rate limit message frequency
- โ Audit log all communications
๐ Summary
Key Takeaways:
โ Agent communication = Messages with sender, receiver, type, content
โ 5 Patterns: Request-Response, Pub-Sub, Broadcast, Pipeline, Blackboard
โ Coordination: Centralized (simple) โ Hybrid (production)
โ Protocols: Natural Language, Structured, Function Call, Event-Driven
โ Challenges: Context loss, ordering, loops, conflicts, overload
โ Security: Authentication, encryption, validation, rate limiting
โ Tools: CrewAI/AutoGen (simple), LangGraph+Redis (production)
Next article la APIs inside Agents paapom โ agents external services epdi use pannเฏเฎฎเฏ! ๐
๐ ๐ฎ Mini Challenge
Challenge: Design Agent Communication Protocol
Multi-agent system-ku communication protocol design panni structure define:
Scenario: 3-agent blog writing team (Researcher, Writer, Editor)
Step 1: Define Message Structure (4 mins)
Standard JSON message template create:
Step 2: Define Communication Patterns (4 mins)
Researcher โ Writer โ Editor โ User
Pattern: Pipeline (sequential)
- Researcher finishes โ sends to Writer
- Writer finishes โ sends to Editor
- Editor finishes โ sends to User
Step 3: Error Handling Protocol (3 mins)
- Message timeout? โ Retry 3 times
- Agent not responding? โ Escalate to human
- Invalid message format? โ Request reformat
- Low quality output? โ Request improvement
Step 4: Implement Message Flow (3 mins)
Pseudo-code:
Communication protocol complete! ๐จ
๐ผ Interview Questions
Q1: Agents epdi effectively communicate pannum?
A: Structured messages: sender, receiver, type, content, metadata. Ambiguity avoid. Context loss prevent. Protocol define. Example: {"from": "Agent A", "to": "Agent B", "type": "task", "content": {...}}
Q2: Agent communication patterns โ when which use?
A:
- Request-Response: Simple, synchronous, 1-1 communication
- Pub-Sub: Events, broadcasting, decoupling
- Pipeline: Sequential workflow (blog writing)
- Blackboard: Shared state (collaborative)
- Hybrid: Complex systems
Choose based on workflow type!
Q3: Agent communication la biggest challenge?
A: Context loss! Agent A-ku therinja details Agent B-ku clear auto come through? Illa! Explicitly pass pannanum. Standardized message format + comprehensive context = critical!
Q4: 10 agents communicate pannaa enna aagum?
A: Communication explosion! 10 agents = potential 45 message paths! Complexity, latency, cost explode. Solution: Hierarchical communication (central coordinator) or pub-sub (event-driven) use!
Q5: Agent communication security?
A:
- Authentication: Verify sender identity
- Encryption: Protect message content
- Validation: Verify message structure
- Rate limiting: Prevent spam
- Audit logs: Track all communication
Production systems: All 5 implement pannum must! ๐
โ Frequently Asked Questions
Test your knowledge: