Agent workflow (input → thinking → output)
⚡ Introduction – Inside the Agent's Mind
Oru AI Agent ku task kodukka, output varum. But naduvula enna nadakkudhu? 🤔
Agent internally oru structured workflow follow pannum:
Input → Parse → Think → Plan → Act → Evaluate → Output
Idha understand pannaa, neenga:
- 🔧 Better agents build pannalaam
- 🐛 Debugging easier aagum
- 🎯 Output quality control pannalaam
- ⚡ Performance optimize pannalaam
Let's open the black box and see what's inside! 📦
📥 Step 1: Input Processing
Agent-ku varum input-a first process pannum:
Input Types:
| Input Type | Example | Processing |
|---|---|---|
| **Text** | User message | NLP parsing |
| **Data** | CSV, JSON | Structure extraction |
| **Events** | API webhook | Event classification |
| **Multi-modal** | Image + text | Multi-model processing |
| **Context** | Conversation history | Context window management |
Input Processing Pipeline:
- Receive – Raw input accept pannum
- Validate – Input format verify pannum
- Classify – What type of request? Categorize pannum
- Enrich – Add context (user history, preferences, time)
- Normalize – Standard format-ku convert pannum
Example:
Good input processing = better reasoning downstream! 🎯
🧠 Step 2: Reasoning / Thinking
Heart of the agent – idhu dhaan magic nadakkum idam! 🪄
Agent's reasoning engine (LLM) indha process follow pannum:
2a. Situation Assessment 📊
- Current state enna? What do I know?
- What's missing? What do I need?
- Any constraints or limitations?
2b. Strategy Formation 🎯
- Multiple approaches consider pannum
- Pros/cons evaluate pannum
- Best strategy select pannum
2c. Task Decomposition 📋
- Big task → small sub-tasks
- Dependencies identify pannum
- Execution order determine pannum
Reasoning Patterns:
| Pattern | How It Works | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| **Chain-of-Thought** | Step-by-step thinking | Complex problems |
| **ReAct** | Reason → Act → Observe loop | Tool-using tasks |
| **Tree-of-Thought** | Explore multiple paths | Creative tasks |
| **Reflection** | Self-critique and improve | Quality-critical tasks |
| **Plan-and-Execute** | Plan first, then execute | Multi-step workflows |
Pro tip: Better reasoning pattern = better agent output! Choose wisely! 🧠
🏗️ Complete Agent Workflow Architecture
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 📥 INPUT LAYER │
│ User Message │ API Event │ Schedule │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 🔍 PARSING & ENRICHMENT │
│ Intent Detection │ Entity Extraction │
│ Context Loading │ History Retrieval │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 🧠 REASONING ENGINE (LLM) │
│ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Assess │ │ Plan │ │
│ │ Situation │ │ Sub-tasks │ │
│ └────────────┘ └────────────────────┘ │
│ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Select │ │ Determine │ │
│ │ Strategy │ │ Tools Needed │ │
│ └────────────┘ └────────────────────┘ │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 🔧 TOOL EXECUTION │
│ API Call │ DB Query │ Web Search │
│ Code Run │ File I/O │ External Service │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 🔄 OBSERVATION & EVALUATION │
│ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │
│ │ Parse Results │ │ Check Quality │ │
│ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ │
│ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │
│ │ Goal Achieved? │ │ Need Retry? │ │
│ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ │
│ │ NO │ YES │
│ │ ┌────────────┘ │
│ │ │ Back to Reasoning │
│ │ └─────────▲──────────────│
└──────────┼──────────────┼─────────────┘
│ YES │
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 📤 OUTPUT GENERATION │
│ Format │ Validate │ Deliver │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
```📋 Step 3: Planning
Reasoning aana next, agent detailed plan create pannum:
Planning Components:
- Task List 📝
- Tool Selection 🔧
| Task | Tool Needed |
|---|---|
| Search flights | Flight Search API |
| Compare prices | Calculator/Logic |
| Check preferences | User Profile DB |
| Select best | Reasoning (LLM) |
| Book flight | Booking API |
| Send confirmation | Email/Notification API |
- Dependency Mapping 🔗
- Task 2 depends on Task 1 results
- Task 4 depends on Task 2 + Task 3
- Task 5 depends on Task 4
- Task 6 depends on Task 5
- Contingency Plans 🛡️
- No flights available? → Try next day
- Booking fails? → Retry or alternative airline
- API down? → Use backup provider
Good planning = smooth execution! 📋
🔧 Step 4: Tool Execution
Plan ready, now agent tools use panni execute pannum:
Tool Execution Flow:
Common Tool Types:
| Category | Tools | Example |
|---|---|---|
| **Search** | Web search, DB query | Google API, SQL |
| **Communication** | Email, messaging | SendGrid, Slack API |
| **Computation** | Calculator, code execution | Python sandbox |
| **Data** | File read/write, transform | CSV parser, JSON |
| **External APIs** | Third-party services | Payment, booking |
| **Memory** | Store/retrieve info | Vector DB, Redis |
Tool execution best practices:
- ✅ Validate params before calling
- ✅ Handle API errors gracefully
- ✅ Parse responses carefully
- ✅ Log every tool call for debugging
- ✅ Set timeout for each call
🎬 Complete Workflow Trace
User Input: "Send a birthday wish to Priya with a nice message"
Trace:
Every step visible and traceable! 🔍
🔄 Step 5: Observation & Evaluation
Action execute aana aprom, agent results evaluate pannum:
Evaluation Criteria:
| Check | Question | Action if Failed |
|---|---|---|
| **Completeness** | Task fully done? | Continue execution |
| **Correctness** | Result accurate? | Retry with different approach |
| **Quality** | Output good enough? | Refine and improve |
| **Goal Match** | Aligns with original goal? | Re-plan if deviated |
| **Error Check** | Any errors occurred? | Handle or escalate |
Self-Evaluation Example:
Key insight: Good agents are self-critical – mediocre agents just output and stop! 🪞
📤 Step 6: Output Generation
Finally, agent output format panni deliver pannum:
Output Formatting:
| Output Type | Format | Example |
|---|---|---|
| **Text** | Natural language | "Your flight is booked!" |
| **Structured** | JSON, table | Booking details JSON |
| **Action** | System action | API call executed |
| **Multi-modal** | Text + image | Report with charts |
| **Notification** | Alert/message | Email/SMS sent |
Good Output Characteristics:
- ✅ Clear – User easily understand pannum
- ✅ Complete – All requested info included
- ✅ Actionable – User enna pannanum clear aa irukku
- ✅ Formatted – Readable, organized
- ✅ Honest – Limitations mentioned if any
Bad Output Example: ❌
"Done."
Good Output Example: ✅
"✈️ Flight booked! Chennai → Bangalore, Feb 18, IndiGo 6E-201,
Departure 8:30 AM, Arrival 9:45 AM. Cost: ₹2,500.
Confirmation #: IND-789456. E-ticket sent to your email."
🔁 The Iteration Loop
Agent workflows rarely single-pass la finish aagum. Iteration is key!
Common Loop Patterns:
1. Retry Loop 🔄
2. Refinement Loop ✨
3. Exploration Loop 🔍
4. Correction Loop 🔧
Iteration limits set pannunga! Otherwise infinite loops possible! ⚠️
Typical: max_iterations = 10, timeout = 60 seconds
🧪 Try It – Trace Your Own Workflow
💡 Workflow Optimization Tips
Speed up your agent workflows:
1. Parallel Execution ⚡ – Independent tool calls simultaneously run pannunga
2. Caching 💾 – Same query ku same result? Cache it!
3. Early Exit 🚪 – Goal achieved early aa? Stop the loop!
4. Smart Tool Selection 🔧 – Right tool first time la select pannunga
5. Context Pruning ✂️ – Unnecessary info remove pannunga from context
Performance benchmarks:
| Optimization | Speed Improvement |
|-------------|-------------------|
| Parallel tools | 40-60% faster |
| Response caching | 30-50% fewer API calls |
| Early exit | 20-40% less iterations |
| Context pruning | 15-25% faster reasoning |
🐛 Debugging Agent Workflows
Agent expected output tharaala? Debug panna:
1. Trace Logging 📋
Every step log pannunga – input, reasoning, tool calls, output
2. Step-by-Step Inspection 🔍
Which step la wrong output vandhuchu? Isolate and fix
3. Common Issues:
| Problem | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong tool selected | Poor tool descriptions | Better tool docs |
| Infinite loop | No exit condition | Add max iterations |
| Bad output format | No format instructions | Add output schema |
| Missing info | Incomplete parsing | Better input processing |
| Hallucinated data | No tool verification | Always verify with tools |
4. Testing Strategy 🧪
- Unit test each workflow step
- Integration test full workflow
- Edge case testing (empty input, API failures)
- Load testing (concurrent requests)
Golden rule: If you can't trace it, you can't debug it! 📋
📝 Summary
Key Takeaways:
✅ Agent workflow: Input → Parse → Reason → Plan → Act → Evaluate → Output
✅ Input processing – validate, classify, enrich, normalize
✅ Reasoning – Chain-of-Thought, ReAct, Tree-of-Thought patterns
✅ Planning – Task decomposition, tool selection, dependency mapping
✅ Tool execution – API calls, DB queries, computations
✅ Evaluation – Self-critique, quality checks, goal verification
✅ Output – Clear, complete, actionable, well-formatted
✅ Iteration – Retry, refine, explore, correct loops
✅ Debug with trace logging and step-by-step inspection
Next article la Memory in Agents paapom – agents epdi remember pannும்! 🧠💾
🏁 🎮 Mini Challenge
Challenge: Trace Complete Agent Workflow
Agent workflow na fully understand panna hands-on trace:
Your Task: "Convert ₹1000 to USD, compare with gold price, send summary email"
Step-by-step Trace (15 mins):
[INPUT] "₹1000 to USD kaen? Gold price compare pannu, summarize pannunga"
[PARSE]
- Intent: currency_conversion + comparison
- Entities: Amount=1000, From=INR, To=USD, Compare=gold
- Context: User wants summary email
[REASON]
- Need 3 data points: USD rate, INR amount, gold price
- Decision: Call currency API first, then gold API, format comparison
[PLAN]
- Fetch INR→USD rate
- Calculate: 1000 INR = ? USD
- Fetch gold price (per gram in INR)
- Create comparison
- Generate summary
- Send email
[EXECUTE]
[ACT 1] API call → exchange_rate(INR, USD) → 1 INR = 0.012 USD → 1000 INR = ₹12
[ACT 2] API call → gold_price() → ₹7500/gram
[ACT 3] Compare: $12 USD = ~0.0016 grams gold
[ACT 4] Format output
[ACT 5] send_email(user@email.com, summary)
[EVALUATE]
- All steps completed? ✅
- Quality OK? ✅
- Ready to output? ✅
[OUTPUT]
"1000 INR = $12 USD. Current gold price: ₹7500/gram. So $12 = 0.0016g of gold. Summary sent to your email! 📧"
Complete trace pannaa, workflow architecture clear aagum! 🔍
💼 Interview Questions
Q1: Agent workflow-la input processing edhuku critical?
A: Garbage input → garbage reasoning → garbage output. Input processing good aa irundha (intent clear, entities extracted, context enriched), whole workflow smooth aagum. First step proper aa, rest easy!
Q2: Reasoning patterns – which when use pannanum?
A:
- Chain-of-Thought: Step-by-step thinking complex problems-ku
- ReAct: Tool-using tasks-ku (most common)
- Tree-of-Thought: Multiple solutions explore panna-onum (creative)
- Reflection: Quality improvement-ku (iterative)
Select pattern = task type match pannunga!
Q3: Agent workflow la iteration loop necessary aa?
A: Very! First attempt wrong result varalaam. Retry, refine, explore loops necessary:
- Retry: API fail, retry
- Refine: Quality low, improve
- Explore: Multiple solutions find
Without loops, agent fragile aagum!
Q4: Agent workflow la biggest bottleneck enna?
A:
- Reasoning latency (LLM slow)
- Tool execution time (APIs slow)
- Context window limits
- Communication overhead
Optimize: parallel tools, caching, context pruning, smaller models use!
Q5: Workflow debugging best practice?
A:
- Trace logging (every step detail)
- Step-by-step inspection (isolated testing)
- Unit test steps (individual validation)
- Integration test (full flow)
- Edge cases (empty input, API errors)
If you can't trace, you can't debug! Logging = critical! 📋
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Test your workflow knowledge: